Flux per unit of cross-sectional area is called. While the total amount of the flux produced by a magnet is important, we are more interested in how dense or concentrated, the flux is per unit of cross-sectional area. the amount of radiation incident on a surface, it is converted into a temperature via the StefanBoltzmann equation. Flux density is the measure of the number of magnetic lines of force per unit of cross-sectional area. ![]() Rather than expressing this measure as a flux density, i.e. If the form of the beam is known, the integral flux density can be converted into the local flux density. The MRT is a measure of the total radiation from the atmosphere and the ground (radiant environment) incident on an object from all directions. The central result is that the integral flux density is directly accessible as a measured variable, while the effect on the tissue is determined by the local flux density. The significance of the integral and local energy density for hard-tissue ablation is described, based on the practical example of the ablation of dental hard substance. Also presented are the consequences of the mathematical concepts in terms of measurement, giving particular consideration to the case where the energy density as the measured variable matches the integral energy density. where is the photon flux and q is the value of the electronic charge 1.6 ♱0 -19. The equation is: H ( W m 2) × h c using SI units H ( W m 2) × q 1.24 ( m) for wavelength in m H ( W m 2) × q E ( e V) for energy in eV. In connection with the inhomogeneous energy distribution in the Gaussian beam, a concept of integral and local energy density is discussed, which differs from the customary definition of the energy density as a constant. To determine the power density in units of W/m², the energy of the photons must be in Joules. The present paper gives definitions for the flux densities of simple, radially symmetrical beam cross-sections, taking the top-hat and Gaussian profiles as examples. ![]() This failure to observe the inhomogeneous intensity distribution within the beam cross-section, combined with the imprecise knowledge of the beam diameter, leads to flux densities being stated that represent mean values at best. In addition, there is usually no consistency in the choice of a suitable measuring method for determining the beam diameter. When calculating applied flux densities in practice, the beam profile of a laser is often erroneously assumed to be homogeneous.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |